Marianismo
Marianismo is defined as "a belief in the spiritual superiority of women based on their sisterhood to the Virgin Mary. . .These women were not seen as equals, but were expected to fulfill their role as wife and mother. Women were, and still are, expected to be selfless in love, devoted to their families, and always postpone their own goals in favor of family members. They are to sacrifice all to please their entire family, but especially the male members."
What is it in our global culture that has the majority of women convinced that sacrifice and selflessness signify a morally sound woman? What do you think of the assumption that females, if mentally stable, are all willing to not only play the role of mother, but give up their own lives to do so, while men are never questioned about why they did not put their careers on hold around age 30 to start a family? I am sure exceptions to the rule exist, but what is important here is that these assumptions and expectations are the rule.
What I am asking is a loaded question: What is wrong when in a society, instead of encouraging cooperative childrearing, competition is promoted among moms to see who can, in the spirit of Marianismo, sacrifice the most? How do we change this narrowminded thinking?
« grrrly news 5/7 | whb homepage | grrrly news 5/14 »
your comments : post a new comment
OH, what an excellent topic! And it fits right along with what I've been saying about sacrifice and selflessness in relationships.
I'll try to write about this later.
Posted by: drublood on May 11, 2003 09:08 PM |
Hey, this one got me going on yet another of my "pet peeves", so my response is already up here. I'm sure I'll be editing it for days to come yet though.
Posted by: vic... on May 11, 2003 09:37 PM |
Hmm... My response is up here.
The gist: Even outside of childrearing, self sacrificing women are idealized. Can we point to the old religious sentiment "obey (and serve) thine husband" as the root? How can we fix the problem?
Ugh... Nevermind people who have two X chromosomes and yet *GASP* aren't champing the bit to add to global overpopulation.
I'll have to think about this one. I'm still having the "motherhood... ew..." emotional reaction.
Posted by: revolution9 on May 12, 2003 09:32 AM |
OK...mine is up here. I feel like it's a bit rambling, but I was busy, um, taking care of my kids.
Posted by: drublood on May 12, 2003 10:21 AM |
mine is posted here
Posted by: isa on May 12, 2003 11:35 AM |
*G* well, I really ran off at the mouth on this one. I don't actually think I said anything (even though there is one comment, that I bet I'll get "feed back" on :D)
And I'm already feeling like adding "more" to my statment :)
Well, post posted. I might be one to tack on more, too.
Grrr. I'm all irritated now.
Posted by: revolution9 on May 12, 2003 11:53 AM |
give me a few to write on this one. i too have to take care of my kid.
Posted by: ms lauren on May 12, 2003 11:56 AM |
I just realized that I totally didn't touch on the bifurcation of man v. woman w/r/t sacrificing for children. Which is funny, because my husband does not work outside the home, and when he did he worked a crappy unrewarding job that would be the closest thing to sacrificing for the children that I'd be willing to admit to. hahahahaha.
Posted by: drublood on May 12, 2003 01:11 PM |
Updated to include a little something about gender expectations based on sexual orientation.
Posted by: revolution9 on May 12, 2003 01:40 PM |
I've tossed my two cents into the pot, you can read it here.
Posted by: subversity on May 12, 2003 05:07 PM |
This is slightly off topic, but occurred to me after reading subversity's comments and thinking about the role of men and parenting in our society.
Men are hurt too by the societal expectations around child rearing. They are de-masculinized when they choose to be the stay at home parent. In custody battles, most courts default to the mother and the father must prove her incompetent to even gain equal custody, rather than a fair evaluation of both parents. Deadbeat dads are a problem, but so are women who abuse the courts for money. I have watched a man get totally screwed by the mother of one of his children. He was poor, she was not, but she was awarded far more then was necessary for raising the kid and far more then he could afford. Granted, he's a terrible (absent) father to all his children, but the same thing happens to caring men.
So basically our culture screws everybody by adhering to stereotypes in childrearing.
I was not going to respond until later this week, but after reading just two responses, I thought I'd better clear up some things, stat. So here I go reminding people not to make assumptions about the experiences other people may have had.
I'll answer the second part later in the week.
Posted by: Kerri on May 13, 2003 10:48 AM |
See my modern-history-focused rambling here: blog. I've been thinking/reading a lot about the ideals/practice of the American "greatest generation" and how that influences & parallels life today, so of course the question got answered in that context.
I might add more later. I think the loaded nature of the question may have sent us in more directions than intended, but this has been one of the most informative threads, for me at least. ;)
Posted by: april on May 13, 2003 04:55 PM |
I decided to post something here I posted in a response on my own blog. "... I enjoy the collab topics so much. Even if we don't agree with the questions, or each other, I think the combined effort of everyone together makes much more than the individual posts. I think it would be interesting to try to combine all of the answers into a larger "paper" and see what we come up with. Maybe someday when i have time. But then, lately, that would mean never." And I mean that. I was amazed at the diversity and depth of the responses to this question. I think it would make an excellent overall paper.
I finally gathered my thoughts together (major feat) and posted a response on my blog. There simply is not enough room here to say all I needed to say.
Posted by: Bernie on May 14, 2003 09:06 AM |
*ahem* If anyone has suggestions to make or off-topic comments, why not use the We Have Brains msgboard (located beneath the tiara) for that.
Posted by: Kerri on May 14, 2003 09:58 AM |
We need more selflessness and sacrifice,
more martyrs, cooks and cleaners. "Tie your shoes".
"Take out the trash", "Go brush your teeth", I'll lose
my temper soon, and you'll be sorry! Vice
no longer comes to play here, virtue sings
her songs upon my window pane. This cross
is just to heavy, dear, and yet it's loss
would leave me empty in its absence. Bring
me martyrs, mothers, victims, and their life
I'll take into my soul, and make their pain
my own. For I'm a blood soaked icon, just
a patriarchal relic. Now I must
get back to work - for sonnetry is vain
amusement, for a lowly servant wife.
From my latest post After reading, and truly enjoying, everyone’s posts about Marianismo, I feel compelled to write another post. The last time I wrote, I tried to generalize. This time I am going to be specific, about my own specific experiences, and see if it comes off any different. So this may, or may not, be a response to the topic, but that’s never stopped me from writing before and I’m sure it will not in the future. read more...
Posted by: vic... on May 14, 2003 05:19 PM |
I managed to be topical. Go me
Posted by: the absent student on May 15, 2003 10:14 AM |
Wahoo! I got my sister Bonnie to respond to your topic (and she did TWO posts about it). I love spreading the word. I think you guys do a great job and keep those little grey cells working! (Though just like children don't grow up to be the person their parents expect, the responses can be not what you expect either.
Posted by: Vic... on May 15, 2003 03:11 PM |
Bizarre that I was just thinking about this and then I find it being discussed here. In any case, I'll post more of a response next time I update my site.
What I was thinking about was the fact that these Ideals, of the selfless mother figure, extend far beyond actual motherhood and translate into expectations of women as friends, lovers, bosses, etc. - that we're supposed to be understanding, forgiving, etc., even under the worst of circumstances. And when we're not, we're "bitchy" or cold. I've seen this undermine women's own understandings of themselves - making a decision, first, that seems right to them, and then second guessing themselves when they're questioned or accused of "selfishness" in the process.
This had been a frustration of Virginia Woolf's - she calls the phenomenon the "Angel in the House". What's sad to me in thinking about that is the fact that something noticed and struggled against so long ago STILL plagues us today, and is so deeply rooted in our psyche that women can become unraveled just thinking about the fact that some things are supposed to be their "duty" - like putting others first.
Theresa
archives (by subject)
about the site
activism
collab topics
grrrly news
miscellany
opinions
posting guidelines
recommended reading
staff profiles
they have brains
complete archive list
be assimilated